Author: Hristo
Date: 20:01:02 06/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 24, 2003 at 20:10:15, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On June 24, 2003 at 19:21:20, Andreas Guettinger wrote: > >>On June 24, 2003 at 17:02:42, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >> >>>On June 24, 2003 at 14:02:02, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >>> >>>>On June 24, 2003 at 10:15:48, Dan Andersson wrote: >>>> >>>>>http://www.haxial.com/spls-soapbox/apple-powermac-G5/ >>>> >>>>I very good laugh indeed. The guy in the article compares G5/Xeon results using >>>>VeriTest compiled on gcc3.3 with Intel P4 results and another Dell WS with >>>>VeriTest compiled on Intel C++ 7.0 compiler. >>>> >>>> >>>>Compiler: >>>>Intel C++ 7.0 build 20021021Z >>>> Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 7.0.9466 (libraries) >>>> >>>>The AMDs may be faster but you cannot compare benchmarks compiled with different >>>>compilers. >>> >>>I understand why you think what you do. You want to see how different CPUs >>>perform running the exact same code. Allowing different binaries to be run on >>>the different CPUs seem to lose control over a variable you prefer to be held >>>constant. >>> >> >>I think that's what Apple wanted to do. What I want to see doesen't matter.... >>:) >>They wanted to show that their CPU ist competitive. The "fastest computer on the >>planet" was maybe a bit to much. ;) >> >>It all depends what you want. I try to avoid binaries for Intel, that's why I > >What processor do you use that doesn't run Intel binaries?? > Dual PPC G4, with OS X, Yellowdog linux + Sparc Regards. >-Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.