Author: William H Rogers
Date: 07:15:24 10/23/98
Go up one level in this thread
How about the following?
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| | . | | . | | . | | . |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| . | | . | | . | B | i | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| | . | | . | I | . | | . |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| . | | . | | . | | i | I |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| | b | | k | | I | | . |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| . | | . | | . | K | . | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| | . | | . | | . | | . |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
| . | | . | | . | | . | |
+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+
The numbers and letters are sort of redundant, as the board is almost shown from
whites perpestive. I think the board looks cleaner this way.
Bill
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.