Author: Peter Hegger
Date: 08:51:35 10/23/98
I'm about a 1650 player at ICC. Handle is "abel2" I have noticed in my games against some weaker computer programs (wimpB, xeniac etc..) that about 65% of the time I score the full point. These programs pretty much average about the same rating as I do. When it comes to playing humans of about the same calibre I'm losing 65% of my games. Am I alone in being better at playing machines than humans? Has anyone else noticed the same thing? I also wonder if a GM, given the choice of playing either a 2500 computer or a 2500 human at 40/2, which would he/she choose? BTW, I have about 400 games at ICC and 90% are blitz. Is that a large enough sampling to be statistically relevent? Thanks Peter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.