Author: Timothy J. Frohlick
Date: 00:41:57 06/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
New game 3rr1k1/1bqnbp1p/ppp1p1pB/6N1/3P3Q/3B4/PPP2PPP/3RR1K1 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Hiarcs 8 on AMD 1500 Mhz 128 MB Hash 512 MB RAM 1.c3 = (0.24) Depth: 1 00:00:00 1.c3 c5 = (0.09) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 1.Qh3 Bf8 = (0.10) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 1.c4 Bf6 = (0.16) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 1.c4 Bf6 2.b4 = (0.13) Depth: 3/12 00:00:00 1.Qh3 Rb8 ² (0.45) Depth: 3/12 00:00:00 1.Qh3 Bf6 2.Nf3 ² (0.52) Depth: 3/14 00:00:00 1.Qh3 Bb4 2.Qf3 Re7 ² (0.36) Depth: 4/14 00:00:00 1.Qh3 Bf6 2.Nf3 c5 3.c3 ² (0.52) Depth: 5/14 00:00:00 8kN 1.Qh3 Bf6 2.Nxh7 Bxd4 3.Bg5 Rb8 ² (0.61) Depth: 6/18 00:00:00 43kN 1.Qh3 Bf6 ± (0.86) Depth: 7/20 00:00:01 208kN 1.Qh3 Bf6 2.c3 Nf8 3.Ne4 Qe7 4.Bf4 ± (1.08) Depth: 7/20 00:00:02 353kN 1.Qh3 Nf8 ± (0.83) Depth: 8/23 00:00:03 541kN 1.Qh3 Bd6 2.Ne4 Be7 3.c3 a5 4.f3 ± (0.79) Depth: 8/25 00:00:05 823kN 1.Qh3 Bd6 ± (1.04) Depth: 9/27 00:00:15 2138kN 1.Qh3 Nf8 ± (1.04) Depth: 9/29 00:00:18 2639kN 1.Qh3 Nf8 2.Bc4 Bf6 3.Ne4 Bg7 4.c3 b5 5.Bxg7 Kxg7 ± (0.83) Depth: 10/31 00:00:40 5846kN 1.Rxe6 fxe6 2.Bxg6 hxg6 3.Bg7 Bxg5 4.Qh8+ Kf7 5.Qh7 Rg8 6.Be5+ Kf8 7.Bxc7 Rg7 8.Qh8+ Rg8 ± (1.09) Depth: 10/31 00:01:43 15069kN (Frohlick, MyTown 28.08.2003) On June 28, 2003 at 02:36:39, Slater Wold wrote: >In 1998, DB solved the following position in 5 seconds... > >[D]3rr1k1/1bqnbp1p/ppp1p1pB/6N1/3P3Q/3B4/PPP2PPP/3RR1K1 w - - 0 1 > >Everyone pretty much agreed, it'd be a while before micro's found it. > >Fritz did. In about 4 hours. >Rebel 10 did. In just over 10 minutes. >Tascbase did (on a K6/300). In just over 8 minutes. > > >SO, how about TODAY? 5 years later... > >Crafty couldn't solve it in 10 minutes. >Fritz 6 couldn't solve it in 10 minutes. >Shredder 7.04 did. In 3:37. >(All run on a P4 3.06Ghz.) > > >Anyone else want to give it a stab?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.