Author: Helmut Conrady
Date: 02:51:08 06/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2003 at 05:40:08, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On June 28, 2003 at 04:41:02, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>> Score TK Hi Ch Fr Sh Ru De Ju >>>>-------------------------------------------------------- >>>> 1: TK 3.23 SKR 10.0 / 14 XX 10 =1 1= == == 11 11 >>>> 2: Hiarcs 8 8.0 / 14 01 XX == =1 11 0= == == >>>> 3: Chess Tiger 15 7.5 / 14 =0 == XX =0 11 =1 0= 1= >>>> 4: Fritz 8 7.5 / 14 0= =0 =1 XX 00 =1 =1 11 >>>> 5: Shredder 7.04 7.0 / 14 == 00 00 11 XX =1 1= 01 >>>> 6: Ruffian 1.0.5 6.5 / 14 == 1= =0 =0 =0 XX 1= 01 >>>> 7: Deep Sjeng 1.5 5.5 / 14 00 == 1= =0 0= 0= XX 1= >>>> 8: Junior 8 4.0 / 14 00 == 0= 00 10 10 0= XX >>>>-------------------------------------------------------- >>>>56 games: +20 =24 -12 >>> >>> >>>What is going on with Junior 8 ? >> >> >>Look at the testing conditions and find the answer yourself. > > I don't really think there is anything strange with time controls, >hash tables,hardware or anything else, so what do you think it's >wrong with test conditions? Perhaps Junior don't feel confortable >playing in Germany? > Anyway, maybe the "problem" for the bad performance of Junior 8 >is the remis book. It's known that in a tournament Junior will propably >have the least draws of all, so playing with a book which is made from >drawn positions from GM's, lead Junior to play from "almost drawn" >positions for a win. Shouldn t any book line end in a equal position? :) Remis.book.ctg contents some very very sharp positions (e.g. in the King´s Gambit), too. Helmut
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.