Author: Rex
Date: 04:53:20 06/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
WHAT testing conditions. Last I saw ALL engines had THE SAME testing conditions. These excuses of "oh ponder was not on" or "oh different opening book" is for the birds. If an engine is that particular about an opening book or time setting then that engine needs_some_work_ and deserves to be last place. Now maybe one can say Junior 8 has been worked on for so long to play HUMANS, Kasparov match, that maybe comp ver comp matches is not one of Juniors best opponets. I do believe Junior could be (close to Rebel) one of the best if not the best ver humans. On June 28, 2003 at 04:41:02, Harald Faber wrote: >On June 28, 2003 at 03:00:04, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On June 28, 2003 at 02:13:05, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >> >>>both engines are still better placed than >>>Junior 8. >> >>> Score TK Hi Ch Fr Sh Ru De Ju >>>-------------------------------------------------------- >>> 1: TK 3.23 SKR 10.0 / 14 XX 10 =1 1= == == 11 11 >>> 2: Hiarcs 8 8.0 / 14 01 XX == =1 11 0= == == >>> 3: Chess Tiger 15 7.5 / 14 =0 == XX =0 11 =1 0= 1= >>> 4: Fritz 8 7.5 / 14 0= =0 =1 XX 00 =1 =1 11 >>> 5: Shredder 7.04 7.0 / 14 == 00 00 11 XX =1 1= 01 >>> 6: Ruffian 1.0.5 6.5 / 14 == 1= =0 =0 =0 XX 1= 01 >>> 7: Deep Sjeng 1.5 5.5 / 14 00 == 1= =0 0= 0= XX 1= >>> 8: Junior 8 4.0 / 14 00 == 0= 00 10 10 0= XX >>>-------------------------------------------------------- >>>56 games: +20 =24 -12 >> >> >>What is going on with Junior 8 ? > > >Look at the testing conditions and find the answer yourself.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.