Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 05:53:25 06/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2003 at 06:16:27, enrico carrisco wrote:
>On June 28, 2003 at 04:45:39, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On June 28, 2003 at 04:41:02, Harald Faber wrote:
>>
>>>On June 28, 2003 at 03:00:04, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>>>
>>>>On June 28, 2003 at 02:13:05, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>both engines are still better placed than
>>>>>Junior 8.
>>>>
>>>>> Score TK Hi Ch Fr Sh Ru De Ju
>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> 1: TK 3.23 SKR 10.0 / 14 XX 10 =1 1= == == 11 11
>>>>> 2: Hiarcs 8 8.0 / 14 01 XX == =1 11 0= == ==
>>>>> 3: Chess Tiger 15 7.5 / 14 =0 == XX =0 11 =1 0= 1=
>>>>> 4: Fritz 8 7.5 / 14 0= =0 =1 XX 00 =1 =1 11
>>>>> 5: Shredder 7.04 7.0 / 14 == 00 00 11 XX =1 1= 01
>>>>> 6: Ruffian 1.0.5 6.5 / 14 == 1= =0 =0 =0 XX 1= 01
>>>>> 7: Deep Sjeng 1.5 5.5 / 14 00 == 1= =0 0= 0= XX 1=
>>>>> 8: Junior 8 4.0 / 14 00 == 0= 00 10 10 0= XX
>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>56 games: +20 =24 -12
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>What is going on with Junior 8 ?
>>>
>>>
>>>Look at the testing conditions and find the answer yourself.
>>
>>
>> Hi Harald
>> It's always the same: you claim to be the only one in the chess world
>> using the "correct" testing conditions. A somewhat angry tester team
>> who obviously are on the "wrong way".
>> Kurt
>>
>> correct
>
>These "correct" testing conditions also involve mismatched hardware (AMD XP1800+
>and an overclocked Celeron.) Nonsense, really.
>
>Your tests are fine, Kurt. Keep up the good work -- I find the results and
>available games for download very interesting & helpful.
>
>-elc.
Many thanks Enrico for your nice words.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.