Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 07:39:34 06/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2003 at 09:59:30, Uri Blass wrote: >On June 28, 2003 at 08:12:37, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>4 seconds Slate. Does this mean Goliath Light 1.5 is better than Deep Blue? No. >>Does this mean Deep Blue is better than Goliath Light 1.5? No. Does this mean >>Goliath Light 1.5 is better for this particular position? Yes. >> >>:) > >Or maybe it means that GoliathLight is lucky to overevaluate the queen and it >helps it in this position. I dont think Goliath is lucky here, it is simply a strong tactician. > >The main problem of engines that cannot solve the problem fast like movei that >may need some hours is problem to see that white is significantly better after >the following moves: I dont think so. The main problem is to find 3.Bg7. Once an engine finds this move it gives positive scores very quickly. > >1. Rxe6 fxe6 2. Bxg6 hxg6 3. Bg7 Bxg5 4. Qh8+ Kf7 5. Qh7 Rg8 6. Be5+ Kf8 7. >Bxc7 * > >Uri 1.Qh3 is also worth considering here and top programs might favour it for a long time because of positional factors (High mobility).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.