Author: Harald Faber
Date: 09:35:53 06/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2003 at 04:45:39, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On June 28, 2003 at 04:41:02, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On June 28, 2003 at 03:00:04, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>On June 28, 2003 at 02:13:05, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>> >>>>both engines are still better placed than >>>>Junior 8. >>> >>>> Score TK Hi Ch Fr Sh Ru De Ju >>>>-------------------------------------------------------- >>>> 1: TK 3.23 SKR 10.0 / 14 XX 10 =1 1= == == 11 11 >>>> 2: Hiarcs 8 8.0 / 14 01 XX == =1 11 0= == == >>>> 3: Chess Tiger 15 7.5 / 14 =0 == XX =0 11 =1 0= 1= >>>> 4: Fritz 8 7.5 / 14 0= =0 =1 XX 00 =1 =1 11 >>>> 5: Shredder 7.04 7.0 / 14 == 00 00 11 XX =1 1= 01 >>>> 6: Ruffian 1.0.5 6.5 / 14 == 1= =0 =0 =0 XX 1= 01 >>>> 7: Deep Sjeng 1.5 5.5 / 14 00 == 1= =0 0= 0= XX 1= >>>> 8: Junior 8 4.0 / 14 00 == 0= 00 10 10 0= XX >>>>-------------------------------------------------------- >>>>56 games: +20 =24 -12 >>> >>> >>>What is going on with Junior 8 ? >> >> >>Look at the testing conditions and find the answer yourself. > > > Hi Harald > It's always the same: you claim to be the only one in the chess world > using the "correct" testing conditions. I have no idea why you drift into this aggressive tone. 1) I never claimed to be the one and only testing correctly. Or please prove me wrong. 2) I just tried to explain why Junior 8 is last in your current standings. 3) Of course it is still possible that Junior will come back in the remaining rounds. 14 rounds played, 54 rounds to play? > Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.