Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:01:04 06/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2003 at 11:22:48, James T. Walker wrote: >Good luck with Arena. In my opinion, the only thing that makes it tollerable is >the fact that it's free. But I still hardly ever use it. No, I'm not defending >Chessbase. I agree about the GUI. The database functions need fixing. I also >hate the nag boxes when playing auto232 games. It seems that Chessbase missed >the point of automatically playing games between two computers. The idea of >course was to let the computers play games while you are free to do something >else and can check the games later in "quick time". But of course in their >wisdom they decided the best thing to do when something goes wrong is to stop >everything and do nothing. don't forget that they have no interest that you find out how weak their programs are. so why should they deliver a working autoplayer ? >I have also nagged Chessbase about the problems with >the databases but their answer was "have you downloaded the latest update?" >Jim :-)))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.