Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:39:33 06/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2003 at 14:01:04, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On June 28, 2003 at 11:22:48, James T. Walker wrote: > >>Good luck with Arena. In my opinion, the only thing that makes it tollerable is >>the fact that it's free. But I still hardly ever use it. No, I'm not defending >>Chessbase. I agree about the GUI. The database functions need fixing. I also >>hate the nag boxes when playing auto232 games. It seems that Chessbase missed >>the point of automatically playing games between two computers. The idea of >>course was to let the computers play games while you are free to do something >>else and can check the games later in "quick time". But of course in their >>wisdom they decided the best thing to do when something goes wrong is to stop >>everything and do nothing. > > > >don't forget that they have no interest that you find out how weak their >programs are. so why should they deliver a working autoplayer ? If their program is weak than I guess that my program is too weak to be called weak. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.