Author: Helmut Conrady
Date: 10:56:35 06/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 2003 at 10:20:18, Martin Grabriel wrote: >On June 29, 2003 at 09:24:51, Hans van der Zijden wrote: > >>>...way too easy for computers >>> >>>...not a bad game for a couple of patzers we both got a little sloppy near the >>>end. >>> >>>[d] r5k1/p5pp/4p3/1p2N3/2pP4/2P1P3/qP6/5QKR w - - 0 34 >>> >>>My opponent sort of groaned immediately after touching my a2 pawn >>>..understandably so. >> >> >>My brain running at 0.1 hertz comes up with the following: >> >>depth time score variation (1) >> 1-5 2 looks promising 1. Qf7+ Kh8 2. Rxh7+ Kxh7 3. Qh5+ >> 1-5 4 try something else 1. Qf7+ Kh8 2. Rxh7+ Kxh7 3. Qg6+ >> 1-6 8 this must be mate 1. Qf7+ Kh8 2. Qg6 h6 3. Rxh6+ Kg8 >> 1-3 11 ah, now I see it 1. Qf7+ Kh8 2. Ng6++ >> >>My brain is not available for download. >> >>Hans. > >Mine is not as promising. Using LAZY personality and no book/tablebase I get : If you would be able to use for this position a book and the TBs, chess would seem to be nearly solved. :) Helmut
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.