Author: Will Singleton
Date: 18:55:09 06/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 2003 at 12:01:22, Russell Reagan wrote: >On June 29, 2003 at 04:21:32, Tony Werten wrote: > >>IIRC the usual response is: If you organize it, we'll play. >> >>Tony > >It is an odd event, in that no one is really sure who will organize the next >one. It leaves everyone thinking someone else will do it. Someone should contact >Volker to see what his plans are. Perhaps he doesn't have the time or doesn't >want to organize another CCT. > >In the future, it might be a good idea to try and formalize some things. >Currently, everything rests on one unknown person to get free time in their >schedule, or to get motivated. IMO, we should form a group of participants, >organizers, and other people who have an interest in the event, and after each >CCT, elect a few organizers (maybe three people?) for the next event, give them >an approximate time frame (maybe 5-7 months after the previous CCT), and let >that small group hammer things out. > >A small elected group seems better than one unknown person for several reasons. >Three people share the load instead of one. There are probably many people who >are capable and willing to help organize such an event, but many probably feel >unsure about how to accomplish things. Having a small group organize the event >would be beneficial because then highly motivated people with little experience >could be paired with experienced organizers and still help out without making >any crucial errors. Sounds OK to me. I nominate you, McKenzie, and Werten. :) Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.