Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 11:15:58 06/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 30, 2003 at 01:29:37, Johan de Koning wrote: >On June 29, 2003 at 18:32:09, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On June 29, 2003 at 09:57:23, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On June 29, 2003 at 09:35:50, Sherry Washington wrote: >>> >>>>Would that be Shredder7.04, i am reffering to TOP programs >>> >>>I have not seen a better tactical program than CM9000 yet. >> >>that thing doesn't even run at 1 and a half processor and won't show up at world >>champs 2003 even. Very weak of the ubisoft company. > >Why use 1.5 CPU if 1 suffices to beat Diep at an number of CPUs? :-) > >Nice provocation though, but way off-topic in this thread. > >... Johan It is very on topic. You guys never show up at world champs. Play only 2 tournaments 15 minutes from where you live! That's very poor. Note that saying that most users do not use parallel machines is a very weak excuse to explain why The King is not parallel. All future processors will use SMT/HT or whatever it will be called in the future (CMP hopefully). So each chip in itself is already parallel. Every 90% of all users buying a new computer will have a parallel machine then. All new P4 chips have SMT to just mention a thing. DIEP is ready for it. So is deep sjeng. Shredder too. Fritz you need to pay double and for a bugfixed version you again need to pay 68 euro. How about chessmaster? You're just telling another commercial BS story to the public right now. Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.