Author: Roberto Nerici
Date: 01:38:37 07/01/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 30, 2003 at 03:44:09, Sune Fischer wrote: >On June 29, 2003 at 23:21:42, Eugene Nalimov wrote: > >>On June 29, 2003 at 23:00:29, Jay Urbanski wrote: [snip] >>>I'm certainly happy to be able to run all my exisiting software faster than any >>>other processor on the planet can run it. And Opteron is currently the fastest >>>shipping processor around for Integer performance, period. Yeah Itanium II and >>>Madison are faster in floating point - but they cost several thousand dollars a >>>pop also. >> >> >>SPECint 2K: >> >>Opteron: 1095 (base) / 1170 (peak) >>P4: 1164 (base) / 1200 (peak) >> >>http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2003q2/cpu2000-20030421-02108.html >>http://www.spec.org/cpu2000/results/res2003q2/cpu2000-20030422-02135.html >> >>Thanks, >>Eugene > >Maybe for clarity it should be added that the Opteron was running 32 bit >binaries. >"Opteron" could confuse people into thinking this was a 64-bit test. :) > >-S. Is this Opteron figure really for a 32 bit build? If so then I agree it is misleading to just quote it without clarification, especially in the context of this thread. I certainly first read this without realising (ok, maybe I am easily duped!) Roberto/.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.