Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: a question for you Vincent

Author: Sune Fischer

Date: 05:00:29 07/01/03

Go up one level in this thread


On July 01, 2003 at 00:37:26, Aaron Gordon wrote:

>My overclocked chips do NOT have problems. Not a single one of the *MANY*
>pretested overclocked chips I have sold has had any problems. All chips are
>tested extremely well before I ship them.

You may run prime or seti or whatever for hours and it's rock solid, two weeks
later opening notepad it crashes.
This has happended to me many times, you never know where it will crash, maybe
the ambient temp is up by 0.5 degree, or maybe a bit of dust on the fans or
perhaps some pherial hardware can't handle it.
This is the problem of overclocking, it takes weeks to test.

>The main reason they don't have problems is because of my testing AND the chips
>aren't overclocked much from a technical aspect (whats printed on the chip means
>NOTHING.. a 1700+ core have a better 'core' than a 2800+!). Just because a 1700+
>is running 3200+ or more doesn't mean it's going to have more problems than a
>2200+ at 3200+ for example.  Infact, there isn't a single 2200+ that can hit
>2.4GHz (3200+) because they use Tbred-A cores. I get hand-picked 1700+ chips
>that have 2.4GHz cores. I've explained all of this many times before and will
>not go into it again, but I will assure you that you won't have any problems.

You can't be sure of this either.
Sometimes cores from the same batch will clock differently, remember the 1 GHz
AXIA's?
Some would up to 1.5 GHz others only 1.2 or 1.3, it was a lottery.

That's my experiences anyway.

-S.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.