Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: chess and neural networks

Author: Ralph Stoesser

Date: 11:27:57 07/01/03

On July 01, 2003 at 14:21:12, Tom Kerrigan wrote:

>On July 01, 2003 at 13:32:19, Ralph Stoesser wrote:
>
>>Hello *,
>>
>>Why no top engine uses neural networks for positional evaluation in non-tactical
>>situations? Are there interesting publications about neural networks and chess
>>programming?
>>
>>Ralph
>
>Neural networks are for analyzing things that are
>"fuzzy"--voice/image/handwriting recognition, etc. Chess is a very exacting
>game. (It makes a big difference if your rook is on d1 vs. e1.) I doubt neural
>networks will ever be useful for chess.
>
>-Tom

I know that the worlds best backgammon program (snowie) use neural networks with
great success.

Re: chess and neural networks Magoo 12:14:04 07/01/03
- Re: chess and neural networks Albert Bertilsson 12:42:42 07/01/03
  - Re: chess and neural networks Anthony Cozzie 12:55:07 07/01/03
    - Re: chess and neural networks Albert Bertilsson 13:02:14 07/01/03
      - Re: chess and neural networks Magoo 13:17:37 07/01/03
        
        Re: chess and neural networks Russell Reagan 16:43:43 07/01/03
        
        Re: chess and neural networks Marc van Hal 14:08:29 07/01/03
        
        Re: chess and neural networks Ralph Stoesser 14:27:06 07/01/03
        
        Re: chess and neural networks Marc van Hal 07:46:03 07/02/03
        
        Re: chess and neural networks Ralph Stoesser 08:57:36 07/02/03
        
        Re: chess and neural networks Marc van Hal 10:28:47 07/02/03
        
        Re: chess and neural networks Ralph Stoesser 11:17:46 07/02/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.