Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Playing chess and analysing

Author: Alan Grotier

Date: 13:48:29 07/01/03



 I am a chess player rated by various chess programs at:good times 1600.
 Bad times 1500.

 I have played against a number of the top programes using of course their
 handicap features.

 ChessMaster in my very humble opinion is the best program suited for actual
 play.The different levels-personalities is the best.To play these
 personalities-levels is more agreable due to the way the program adapts
 to the different strenghts of the player.It does seem more human like.It will
 hang pieces on certain lower levels but my human opponents of the same level
 do the same thing.Unfortunately for me I also make the same stupid moves.

 So,ChessMaster for actual play.And for analysis....

 Analysing my games has become a big issue.It is the only way to improve.
 I travel most of the time and find computer chess the only way for me to
 study.

 I use Fritz 5.32 for tactical and Fritz 8.00.23 for a more rounded view.
 Please note I have played F5.32 and F8 against each other and F8 has always
 won.

 Alan






This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.