Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 03:30:32 07/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2003 at 16:07:57, Will Singleton wrote: >On July 01, 2003 at 12:57:11, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>On July 01, 2003 at 05:54:30, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>There are a lot of programmers who chose not to release their private program. >>>Your assumption that Ferret was in high demand has no basis. >>> >>>It was never tested by the ssdf so we do not know if it had chances against the >>>commercial programs in the past with one cpu. >>> >>>Maybe it was simply one of the many programs that are weaker than the commercial >>>programs. >> >>I'm sure that your program SUCKS too, Uri. >> >>bruce > >Uri's point is not that Ferret "sucks," as you and my 13-year-old would put it, >but that since it is unreleased there is no way to judge demand or strength. >Based on tournament results, we can guess at its level of play, and I would >guess it's very strong, maybe approaching Ruffian. (or maybe it is Ruffian!) Now there is an interesting theory! > >Will :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.