Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 09:28:46 07/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2003 at 01:22:54, Russell Reagan wrote: >On July 01, 2003 at 00:59:45, Brian Kostick wrote: > >>Hi Chris Kantack, >> >> While I don't know much about Deep Sjeng or exactly what was sent to you I >>would imagine it to be more along the engine category rather than the interface >>category such as ChessMaster, ChessPartner, Fritz style GUI, Winboard, Arena. > >I think that makes sense. You should be comparing "the king" to "deep sjeng" >instead of "the king and it's nice GUI that has all of the gobs of tutorials, >puzzles, annotated games, verbal analyses, etc." For instance, I don't think The >King has anything to do with Josh Waitzkin verbal commentary. Surely that is >purely the GUI (could be wrong though). would he use Winboard for Deepsjeng? Then you have the times that Chessmaster says a move is bad and then get sweeped away. So don't take anything for granted It is only a program which gives response based on it's evaluation. You also might try take a move back in Chessmaster when it plays pause the program And then let Deep Sjeng evaluate a move. It might have beter chances that way. Because otherwise Chessmaster eats a lot of the sources. And will slowdown other programs extremely. But I beter can say Fritz8 and Shredder7 and ... suck . So you know who you can attack next. Though they do in some way. But I consider Chriss his attack as a trol. Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.