Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 09:31:06 07/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2003 at 09:50:50, Andrei Fortuna wrote: >On July 01, 2003 at 22:56:58, Dan Andersson wrote: > >> I'm partial to PRECCX. It might not be developed any more. So it's stable ;) >>But it is a fully functional *very* extended BNF. Its main selling point is >>inherited and synthetic attributes. And meta-production rules are allowed. One >>neat thing is that you could actually do almost everything in it. A-B and >>Q-search, eval, extensions and pruning if you put in an effort to do it. >>http://www.afm.sbu.ac.uk/precc/ > >Very interesting ! Looks like there is lots of terrain for me to investigate in >the land of grammars/compilers :) It is a nice warm feeling ! > >To be truthful writing a meta-language looks like a great project :) It is kind >of a not-so-explored area where I could add my personal contribution to chess >programming (of course there are CHEVAL written by J.C.Weil and CHE/CHE++ from >Nimzo which are very similar to what I want to do, but not quite the same and >anyway they were pretty much closed source). > >Andrei Why not learn prolog. I have a very expensive book here which you can get for a few $ from me about it. I want to get rid of it ASAP :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.