Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:46:36 10/24/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 1998 at 14:48:12, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Dan and Bruce: >Why you are so concerned with this if Ed is not? Has Ed, in desperation, asked >privately some kind of help from you to avoid these questions? No. >Besides, Is not >the purpose of this site to make public all things concerning chess computers? All things? Even when there is a more appropriate forum? >You never know which post and how can be useful for you. At the same time nobody >is coerced to see all post here or answer them. I suppose If Ed is crushed under >the weight of too much post of this kind, surely he will be capable of posting a >S.O.S. He can just say "please, contact my staff. Stop". >I have take a look at the post about config. etc and it was useful to see a way >to improve my own config. If not for the post, I have not thought of it. Call >it, if you want, a variety of serendipity. Sometimes a post just is helpful to >remember you certain things. Another are not, maybe as this one. Sorry for that. >But, any case, in the abundance no damage exist. Please read my follow-up to Bruce, where I describe the nature of the damage. >I propose to think in >limitations for posting the day Steven, the man that handle the server, ask >that from us, or the day Ed ask it. But not before. I suppose that your perspective may be as valid as mine. But I completely disagree with your position.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.