Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 19:58:31 07/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2003 at 22:39:58, Slater Wold wrote:
>
>That is mate in 13, not 12!
Yes you are correct - I was not aware Fritz GUI would change the mate-in-xx but
you are correct. See Crafty log below without F8 GUI
>
>Also, my 'standard' Crafty gets mate in 13 in 7.96s with a slighty faster
>search.
I know your machine is much faster than mine - so I am not sure what you mean by
faster search - I'm running a 1.7 Ghz. Here's log from a single 1.7 Ghz CPU
with sd=12.
Black(1): mt=1
max threads set to 1
Black(1): thread 1 exiting
2k5/8/3pr2p/5Qp1/8/6P1/3pqP1P/R5K1 w - - 0 1
White(1): go
end-game phase
clearing hash tables
time surplus 29.75 time limit 1:00 (1:00)
depth time score variation (1)
2 0.00 -1.98 1. Qc2+ Kb7 2. Rd1
2-> 0.00 -1.98 1. Qc2+ Kb7 2. Rd1
3 0.00 -1.63 1. Qc2+ Kd7 2. Rd1 Qe1+ 3. Kg2
3-> 0.01 -1.63 1. Qc2+ Kd7 2. Rd1 Qe1+ 3. Kg2
4 0.01 -1.49 1. Qc2+ Kd8 2. Ra8+ Ke7 3. Qh7+ Kf6
4. Qxh6+ Kf5
4-> 0.03 -1.49 1. Qc2+ Kd8 2. Ra8+ Ke7 3. Qh7+ Kf6
4. Qxh6+ Kf5
5 0.03 ++ 1. Qc2+!!
5 0.03 -1.04 1. Qc2+ Kd8 2. Ra8+ Ke7 3. Qh7+ Kf6
4. Qxh6+ Kf5 5. Rf8+ Kg4
5-> 0.06 -1.04 1. Qc2+ Kd8 2. Ra8+ Ke7 3. Qh7+ Kf6
4. Qxh6+ Kf5 5. Rf8+ Kg4
6 0.08 -0.81 1. Qc2+ Kd8 2. Ra8+ Ke7 3. Qh7+ Kf6
4. Qxh6+ Kf5 5. Rf8+ Ke5 6. Qxg5+ Kd4
6-> 0.12 -0.81 1. Qc2+ Kd8 2. Ra8+ Ke7 3. Qh7+ Kf6
4. Qxh6+ Kf5 5. Rf8+ Ke5 6. Qxg5+ Kd4
7 0.17 -0.70 1. Qc2+ Kd8 2. Ra8+ Ke7 3. Qh7+ Kf6
4. Qxh6+ Kf5 5. Rf8+ Ke5 6. Qxg5+ Kd4
7. Qf4+ Kc3
7-> 0.30 -0.70 1. Qc2+ Kd8 2. Ra8+ Ke7 3. Qh7+ Kf6
4. Qxh6+ Kf5 5. Rf8+ Ke5 6. Qxg5+ Kd4
7. Qf4+ Kc3
8 0.47 -0.75 1. Qc2+ Kd8 2. Ra8+ Ke7 3. Qh7+ Kf6
4. Qxh6+ Kf5 5. Rf8+ Ke5 6. Qxg5+ Kd4
7. Qf4+ Kd3 8. Qf5+ Re4
8 0.70 -0.67 1. Ra8+ Kd7 2. Ra7+ Kc6 3. Qc2+ Kd5
4. Ra5+ Kd4 5. Ra4+ Ke5 6. Qb2+ Kd5
7. Rd4+ Kc5 8. Qb4+ Kc6 9. Rxd2
8-> 0.72 -0.67 1. Ra8+ Kd7 2. Ra7+ Kc6 3. Qc2+ Kd5
4. Ra5+ Kd4 5. Ra4+ Ke5 6. Qb2+ Kd5
7. Rd4+ Kc5 8. Qb4+ Kc6 9. Rxd2
9 0.76 ++ 1. Ra8+!!
9 0.92 0.00 1. Ra8+ Kd7 2. Ra7+ Kc6 3. Qc2+ Kd5
4. Ra5+ Kd4 5. Qb2+ Kc4 6. Qb5+ Kc3
7. Ra3+ Kd4 8. Ra4+ Kc3 9. Ra3+
9-> 1.65 0.00 1. Ra8+ Kd7 2. Ra7+ Kc6 3. Qc2+ Kd5
4. Ra5+ Kd4 5. Qb2+ Kc4 6. Qb5+ Kc3
7. Ra3+ Kd4 8. Ra4+ Kc3 9. Ra3+
10 1.86 ++ 1. Ra8+!!
10 2.40 4.31 1. Ra8+ Kd7 2. Ra7+ Kc6 3. Qc2+ Kd5
4. Ra5+ Kd4 5. Qb2+ Kc4 6. Ra4+ Kc5
7. Qc3+ Kb6 8. Rb4+ Qb5 9. Rxb5+ Kxb5
10. Qxd2
10-> 3.69 4.31 1. Ra8+ Kd7 2. Ra7+ Kc6 3. Qc2+ Kd5
4. Ra5+ Kd4 5. Qb2+ Kc4 6. Ra4+ Kc5
7. Qc3+ Kb6 8. Rb4+ Qb5 9. Rxb5+ Kxb5
10. Qxd2
11 4.55 4.29 1. Ra8+ Kd7 2. Ra7+ Kc6 3. Qc2+ Kd5
4. Ra5+ Kd4 5. Qb2+ Kc4 6. Ra4+ Kc5
7. Qc3+ Kb6 8. Rb4+ Qb5 9. Rxb5+ Kxb5
10. Qd3+ Kc6 11. Qxd2
11-> 8.22 4.29 1. Ra8+ Kd7 2. Ra7+ Kc6 3. Qc2+ Kd5
4. Ra5+ Kd4 5. Qb2+ Kc4 6. Ra4+ Kc5
7. Qc3+ Kb6 8. Rb4+ Qb5 9. Rxb5+ Kxb5
10. Qd3+ Kc6 11. Qxd2
12 8.53 ++ 1. Ra8+!!
12 13.31 Mat13 1. Ra8+ Kd7 2. Ra7+ Kc6 3. Qc2+ Kd5
4. Ra5+ Kd4 5. Qb2+ Kc4 6. Qb5+ Kc3
7. Ra3+ Kd4 8. Ra4+ Kc3 9. Qb4+ Kc2
10. Ra2+ Kd3 11. Ra3+ Kc2 12. Rc3+
Kd1 13. Qb1#
12-> 22.03 Mat13 1. Ra8+ Kd7 2. Ra7+ Kc6 3. Qc2+ Kd5
4. Ra5+ Kd4 5. Qb2+ Kc4 6. Qb5+ Kc3
7. Ra3+ Kd4 8. Ra4+ Kc3 9. Qb4+ Kc2
10. Ra2+ Kd3 11. Ra3+ Kc2 12. Rc3+
Kd1 13. Qb1#
time=22.03 cpu=99% mat=-1 n=19446205 fh=97% nps=882k
ext-> chk=2570115 cap=25224 pp=71 1rep=130230 mate=5265
predicted=1 nodes=19446205 evals=393076
endgame tablebase-> probes done=0 successful=0
SMP-> split=0 stop=0 data=0/32 cpu=21.86 elap=22.03
mate in 13 moves.
kibitz mate in 13 moves.
White(1): Ra8+
time used: 22.03
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.