Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Writing a meta-language to describe eval function=about Tempi

Author: Landon Rabern

Date: 23:37:05 07/02/03

Go up one level in this thread

On July 03, 2003 at 01:44:57, margolies,marc wrote:

>Why not use some sort of STEP function triggerred by sets of 3 tempi? When the
>step is greater than 1, say, an engine that had 'solid' parameters could be
>reset to attack.
>I don't get the exponential/logarythmic idea in Betsy. This is a good beginning
>but perhaps it skews values too much.

Yes, this was just a first attempt at something.  Thats what I meant when I
wanted to play with it more.  The whole thing needs to be smarter.  I don't know
about a step function, maybe it needs some encouragement in the inbetween?  But
it is definately good to wait until solid and then switch over to attacking.  I
need to think of a good way to manage this.

Landon

• Re: Writing a meta-language to describe eval function=about Tempi Matthew White 12:54:59 07/03/03
  • Re: Writing a meta-language to describe eval function=about Tempi Andrei Fortuna 13:33:19 07/03/03
    • =about Tempi, pawn moves and eval function -(i dis agree with M>) margolies,marc 00:53:14 07/04/03
      • Re: =about Tempi, pawn moves and eval function -(i dis agree with M>) Andrei Fortuna 02:31:27 07/04/03
        • Re: =about Tempi, pawn moves and eval function -(i dis agree with M>) margolies,marc 22:26:37 07/05/03
          • Re: =about Tempi, pawn moves and eval function -(i dis agree with M>) Andrei Fortuna 02:00:16 07/06/03
            • Re: =about Tempi, pawn moves and eval function -(i dis agree with M>) Ingo Lindam 05:09:17 07/06/03
      • Re: =about Tempi, pawn moves and eval function Ingo Lindam 01:28:53 07/04/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.