Author: Andrei Fortuna
Date: 12:53:00 07/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2003 at 15:09:17, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>On July 03, 2003 at 07:07:04, Andrei Fortuna wrote:
>
>>On July 03, 2003 at 06:26:30, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>>
>>>It appears to be necessary to make clarification for downstream message >writers.
>>> What I am saying is that I don't accept it as okay to package my messages for
>>>your profit without royalty ("plan to charge" or "prohibit inclusion"). If
>>>you're not packaging my messages, then I don't care whether you charge or not
>>>because it no longer involves my work. Simple, yes?
>>
>>Yes.
>>Then we agree, there is no need to argue here.
>>Apologies if you understood that I was going to package your messages along with
>>the offline browser, it is not my intention. I will just write and distribute
>>the tool.
>>
>>Andrei
>
>I thought that either the message database would be included with the tool, or
>the software would download the message database for the user.
I thought of adding an option for automatically updating the database from a
given URL, but it would be more trouble to code and support it (making the app
internet aware would open a new class of support nightmares).
Andrei
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.