Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:01:21 07/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2003 at 15:18:28, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On July 03, 2003 at 07:39:50, Uri Blass wrote: > >>From my experience the bugs that I had are usually not a problem of not >>understanding what is feasable. >> >>for example I have 2 varaibles in my program s and sq when s means the side to >>move and sq means square in the board. >> >>One of my bugs was because I wrote at some point s instead of sq and this kind >>of bug may not discovered immediately if the relevant line is not called often. > >I hope that this has inspired you to use better variable names. > >Dave There are cases when I use longer names but in this case I used both sq and s a lot so I was lazy to write the long names square and side_of_the_attacker. To be more correct: s is not the side to move and for the side to move I have a global varaible with the name side but attacking a square is connected in my thinking with moving and this was the reason for my bad explanation. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.