Author: Chris Kantack
Date: 18:38:09 07/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On June 30, 2003 at 23:32:37, Mike Byrne wrote: >I'm very happy with Deep Sjeng. It's a shame they didn't send me a free >evaluation (sigh). Cm6K -- never even caught my attention. I do like The Cm9K >engine. I think it depends what the user interests are - engine vs engine >matches - Deep Sjeng wins hands down vs Cm6k (meaning Cm6k is not convenient for >engine vs engine matches). For all the goodies you like - Cm6k wins hands down. > Just goes to show not every Chess program is for everybody. Using the word >"sucks" is a little harsh. You seem to be tied to Excalibur machines - I think >they suck - anybody else? Mike, To me, engine strength is so strong now that it doesn't really matter to me if Deep Sjeng can think a little deeper or faster than CM9000. I look for what programs are usable. Deep Sjeng, in my humble opinion, is written for chess geeks only. Fine. I won't review it. But Lokasoft would do well if they enhanced the program for a wider market. My two cents. Chris
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.