Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Considered trying Arena?

Author: Torstein Hall

Date: 06:32:16 07/05/03

Go up one level in this thread


On July 05, 2003 at 04:26:27, Frederic Louguet wrote:

I do not know if Arena would work better, but as this also is a great interface
for running engine matches (if I'm not wrong...) it may be worth a try.

Torstein

>As a debugging experiment, I am running two versions of my program in
>engine-engine matches under winboard (with /mg), at n plies fixed-depth with
>n<=5. Of course at such low depths an entire game does not last more than a few
>seconds, so I could get a lot of data very quickly _IF_ winboard did not take so
>long between each game (about 9/10 seconds).
>
>So my question is : is there a parameter somewhere I have overlooked which could
>help me shorten the time to wait after a game is finished and the other begins ?
>To run a new instance of winboard for each game doesn't help of course because
>of the long "starting chess program" time.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.