Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:27:06 07/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2003 at 14:19:10, Richard Patterson wrote: >On July 06, 2003 at 13:46:46, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On July 06, 2003 at 12:47:46, Mike Byrne wrote: >> >>>it looks much different than the first tourney with 3 of the top names at top in >>>this one... >> >>I do not see big difference. >>Crafty still has more than 50% even if you include Crafty Byrne. >> >>The program that is leading is unimportant because the test is for crafty and >>not to find the best blitz program. >> >>Uri > >Hi Uri, > >When I was heavily into chess more than 16 years ago. I was under the thought, >and correct me if I am off some, if your blitz rating is high then your >tournament level of play with more time was a good way to estimate your actual >rating at that level. If you have a higher blitz rating then you have a higher >tournament rating. Just a thought. > > >Richard I think that for longer time control more tests need to be done. A program may have problems only at long time control because of a bug. A program also may perform better at longer time control because of some search algorithm that is used only at long time control and cannot be used at short time control. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.