Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: question about optimizing code - oups

Author: Gerd Isenberg

Date: 03:38:40 07/07/03

Go up one level in this thread


On July 07, 2003 at 06:36:54, Gerd Isenberg wrote:

>On July 07, 2003 at 06:06:08, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
><snip>
>
>>It is better to do the 8 if statement approach first, because it makes it
>>simpler and easier to debug everything. After everything is debugged and
>>working, use a profiler to determine whether optimizing would really payoff.
>>Most often the conclusion is that it would not and a lot of extra work will be
>>saved. Also, the benefits of simpler clearer code is not to be underestimated.
>
>Hi Ricardo,
>
>agreed - this function must really be a optimization hotspot.
>Anyway, i would suppress a switch with an additional memory lookup like Uri
>suggested:
>
> switch ( i=smallestpower[number] )
>
>because the "higher" cases need less affort than the "lower" ones.
But as Reinhard already mentioned that may depend on the probability of the set
bits.

>Regards,
>Gerd



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.