Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:49:32 07/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2003 at 16:16:19, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On July 05, 2003 at 23:37:47, Jay Urbanski wrote: > >>On July 04, 2003 at 23:33:46, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >><snip> >>>"way better than MPI". Both use TCP/IP, just like PVM. Except that MPI/OpenMP >>>is designed for homogeneous clusters while PVM works with heterogeneous mixes. >>>But for any of the above, the latency is caused by TCP/IP, _not_ the particular >>>library being used. >> >>With latency a concern I don't know why you'd use TCP/IP as the transport for >>MPI when there are much faster ones available. >> >>Even VIA over Ethernet would be an improvement. > >I ignored the statement of Hyatt there even. Such crap it is. > >Best regards, >Vincent You only say "crap" because you don't understand how things like MPI are implemented, along with TCP/IP and any other protocol in existence. As usual, what you don't understand is "crap".
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.