Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 13:08:14 07/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2003 at 11:34:11, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On July 07, 2003 at 10:36:00, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>On July 07, 2003 at 09:54:44, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On July 07, 2003 at 06:27:01, DANIEL JOHNSON wrote: >>> >>>>I PLAN ON BUILDING A NEW DUAL PROCESSOR COMPUTER WHEN THE NEW .09 CHIPS COME OUT >>>>WITH 1 MEG CACHE MEMORY AND HAS 800 MHZ FSB ABOUT 3GB MEMORY, DUAL SATA RAID 0 >>>>HDD, SWIFTECH WATERCOOLING, BUT WHICH CPU WILL BE BEST AND FASTEST FOR CHESS >>>>OPTERON OR XEON >>> >>>Opteron will be trivially in 0.09 >>> >>>The question will be however whether the Xeon is there first in 0.09 or Opteron. >>> >>>I bet at Xeon in 0.09 being there first. >>> >>>As you can see at specint crafty at 64 bits opteron is 1562 rated. this is just >>>1.8Ghz opteron. >>> >>>I expect for other programs when compiled 64 bits and with 16 GPRs and all the >>>other features to be equally fast (having same speed difference). Fritz is >>>assembly. In order to run in 64 bits at opteron Frans Morsch must now already be >>>working at that as for every new processor he has to rewrite nearly the entire >>>program. Must be hard worker that guy! I do not know whether he is busy with >>>that now. I can ask if you want to. >>> >>>For most of the others it is just a simple recompile though. The work i need in >>>diep to profit from having more bits in each register (the other advantages you >>>get for free or are compiler issues) is not little either. It will give a few % >>>though. >>> >>>When opteron is there in 0.09 it will be way faster, the chip is actually >>>designed to be 0.09. It is however interesting to see what speed the prescott >>>core will have in 0.09, i guess they will be sooner there. >>> >>>Best regards, >>>Vincent >> >>Vincent, >> >>will you use an opteron machine in Graz this year? >> >>regards Joachim > >I would if the government didn't provide me with Europes fastest machine for >computerchess available: 1440 processor TERAS machine. 1024 MIPS R14000 >processors and 416 processor Itanium2 1.3Ghz Madisons. > >I'll be running hopefully at 500 processor partition (500 x 500Mhz = 250Ghz). > >Thanks to the dutch government and NWO, NCF, computermanufacturer SGI, WGS, >IKAT, University of Maastricht and another number of organisations i forgot to >mention here (but not deliberately) i am sure diep will try to do its utmost >best in world champs 2003. > >Best regards, >Vincent Do ypu think this time you will get enough time to test and program your engine for such a monster? I remember that last year you switched back to your Dual, because you hadn't enough time to develop your engine fo so many processors. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.