Author: stuart taylor
Date: 18:36:56 07/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2003 at 19:16:59, Chessfun wrote: >On July 07, 2003 at 17:24:51, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On July 07, 2003 at 13:36:11, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>AMD XP 2600+ >>>Game 60' 2" >>>140 games, 10 rounds, 126/140 >>>Own books, ponder=off >>>Crafty and List using general.ctg >>>Junior 8 score first. >>> >>>ChessTiger 15 3.0 - 6.0 +1 -4 =4 >>>ChessTiger 14 5.5 - 3.5 +4 -2 =3 >>>Gambit Tiger 2 5.0 - 4.0 +2 -1 =6 >>>Deep Fritz 7 5.0 - 4.0 +4 -3 =2 >>>Fritz 7 6.5 - 2.5 +5 -1 =3 >>>Fritz 6 5.5 - 3.5 +3 -1 =5 >>>Junior 6a 3.5 - 5.5 +3 -5 =1 >>>Junior 7 6.0 - 3.0 +4 -1 =4 >>>Shredder 7 4.0 - 5.0 +2 -3 =4 >>>Shredder 7.04 5.0 - 4.0 +3 -2 =4 >>>List 5.04 4.5 - 3.5 +2 -1 =5 >>>Nimzo 8 6.0 - 3.0 +5 -2 =2 >>>Hiarcs 8 6.0 - 3.0 +4 -1 =4 >>>Crafty 18.10 6.0 - 3.0 +4 -1 =4 >>> >>>Sarah. >> >> >> Hi Sarah >> Junior 8 is doing rather well. Somewhat surprising the negative score >> vs Junior 6a but of course too lees games played. In our RK 2003 >> tournament [120'/60] Junior 8 is still leading http://www.utzingerkurt.com >> Kurt > >Also did badly v Tiger 15 3-7 final but as you say... > >Sarah. Can anyone point to why Junior might have exposed weaknesses against these programs in particular? (besides the possible reason of "not enough games"). Obviously this is the obvious question. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.