Author: Jeroen van Dorp
Date: 15:25:30 07/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2003 at 16:43:27, Keith Ian Price wrote: >That is not what he said. He said the 40-point difference was meaningful, but >the 2800+ rating was not, since it is not pegged to any absolute rating. As rating only tells you something about strenght differences, and nothing about "absolute" strenght - whatever that may be, how can't a rating be meaningful, yet a rating difference can? J.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.