Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 12:31:50 07/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 10, 2003 at 13:13:00, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 10, 2003 at 12:40:38, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>On July 10, 2003 at 01:53:26, Derek Paquette wrote: >> >>>Just read a great post by the author of DIEP, and how he is getting an >>>Incredible machine, a godly machine I should say, now really, >>>Would a human even have a chance in hell? its going to be dozens of times faster >>>than Deep Blue >>>I know that speed isn't everything, but when you are looking 45ply ahead.... >>>I put all bets on the machine with 500 processors >>> >>>what do the rest of you think? >> >>I'd guess it will still lose to the top commercials, just like it did when he >>had a 1024 processor machine at the last WCCC. Since 1024 didn't work, what >>makes you think only 500 will be better? > >He had not a 1024 processor machine at the last WCCC. >I think that he tried to make Diep using them in a productive way but failed. > >I think that less processors is an easier task. >if 1024 was too hard task for him then maybe 500 is going to be an easier task. > >The first question is how much speed is he going to get from the 500 processors. >I do not predict nothing about it. So what is it that you are predicting about it? :-) > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.