Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Does Anyone know Why Adams vs Deep junior 2000 was drawn????

Author: James T. Walker

Date: 08:12:19 07/12/03

Go up one level in this thread


On July 12, 2003 at 04:34:27, Kurt Utzinger wrote:

>Shredder 7.04 shows a clear winning position for Black at the time when the
>game was adjourned as a draw. I do not understand why draw was agreed:
>
>Adams,M - Comp Deep Junior
>[D]6k1/1p4p1/4r1n1/p1pp4/8/2P2P2/PPB1qQK1/3R4 w - - 0 1
>
>Analysis by Shredder 7.04:
>
>43.Dxe2 Txe2+ 44.Kh3 Txc2 45.Tg1
>  -+  (-3.27)   Tiefe: 1/1   00:00:00
>  -+  (-3.27)   Tiefe: 1/5   00:00:00
>43.Th1 Te5 44.Lf5 Sf4+ 45.Kg1 Dxf2+ 46.Kxf2 Txf5 47.Ke3 g5 48.Kd2 Te5 49.Th2 Kg7
>50.a4 d4
>  -+  (-2.27)   Tiefe: 1/5   00:00:00
>  -+  (-6.34)   Tiefe: 10/35   00:00:05  1439kN
>43.Kg3 De5+ 44.f4 Dh5 45.Tg1 Dh4+ 46.Kg2 Sxf4+ 47.Kf3 Dh5+ 48.Kxf4 Tf6+ 49.Kg3
>Dg5+ 50.Kh2 Txf2+ 51.Kh3 Dxg1 52.Lh7+ Kxh7
>  -+  (-6.33)   Tiefe: 10/35   00:00:07  1952kN
>  -+  (-5.98)   Tiefe: 10/36   00:00:12  3451kN
>43.Kg1 Sf4 44.Dxe2 Txe2 45.Tc1 Td2 46.Kf1 Sg2 47.Lf5 Txb2 48.Tb1 Txa2 49.Le6+
>Kh7 50.Txb7 Sf4 51.Lf5+
>  -+  (-5.97)   Tiefe: 10/36   00:00:13  3505kN
>  -+  (-3.38)   Tiefe: 13/35   00:01:00  15895kN
>
>(Utzinger, MyTown 12.07.2003)
>
>
>On July 12, 2003 at 02:35:10, Sherry Washington wrote:
>
>>[Event "KasparovChess GP g/60"]
>>[Site "Internet"]
>>[Date "2000.02.16"]
>>[Round "2.1"]
>>[White "Adams, Michael"]
>>[Black "Comp Deep Junior"]
>>[Result "1/2-1/2"]
>>[ECO "C54"]
>>[WhiteElo "2715"]
>>[PlyCount "84"]
>>[EventDate "2000.02.09"]
>>[Source "ChessBase"]
>>[SourceDate "2000.05.31"]
>>
>>1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Nf6 3. d3 Bc5 4. Nf3 Nc6 5. c3 a6 6. Nbd2 O-O 7. Bb3 Ba7 8. h3
>>h6 9. Qe2 d6 10. Nf1 Na5 11. Bc2 Re8 12. Ng3 Nc6 13. O-O Bd7 14. Nh2 Be6 15.
>>Bb3 d5 16. Ng4 Nxg4 17. hxg4 Qd7 18. Nf5 Rad8 19. Bc2 Ne7 20. Rd1 a5 21. g3 h5
>>22. d4 exd4 23. Nxd4 Bxg4 24. f3 Bh3 25. Bg5 f6 26. Be3 c6 27. Kh2 Bb8 28. Bf4
>>Bxf4 29. gxf4 Ng6 30. Qe3 Nf8 31. Qg1 Be6 32. Qg3 Qc7 33. e5 h4 34. Qxh4 fxe5
>>35. fxe5 c5 36. Nxe6 Rxe6 37. Kg2 Rxe5 38. Re1 Rde8 39. Rxe5 Qxe5 40. Rd1 Re6
>>41. Qg3 Qe2+ 42. Qf2 Ng6 {a draw agreed, but why?} 1/2-1/2
>>
>>
>>
>>Fritz8 say's that the position for black is completely winning, how on earth was
>>this game drawn?

IIRC Adams demanded the draw and the Junior team complied.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.