Author: ERIQ
Date: 14:34:34 07/12/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2003 at 17:32:18, ERIQ wrote: >On July 12, 2003 at 16:47:58, Anson T J wrote: > >>On July 12, 2003 at 16:36:25, ERIQ wrote: >> >>>What about adjusting ssdf ratings -100 for the 2700+ and 2800+ >>>and -50 for 2600+ and so on. >>> >>>This looks a lot closer to a possible fide rating for hardware involved. 2800+ >>>on a 1200 just looks unrealistic to me. >>> >>>1 Shredder 7.04 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2710 >>>2 Shredder 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2670 >>>3 Fritz 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2662 >>>4 Deep Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2661 >>>5 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2642 >>>6 Shredder 6.0 Pad UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 2624 >>>7 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2621 >>>8 Chess Tiger 15.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2620 >>>9 Shredder 7.0 UCI 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2617 >>>9 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2617 >>>11 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2615 >>>12 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2612 >>>13 Junior 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2647 >>>14 Hiarcs 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2632 >>>15 Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2625 >>>16 Ruffian 1.0.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2622 >>>17 Chess Tiger 15.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2618 >>>18 Shredder 5.32 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2609 >>>18 Gandalf 4.32h 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2609 >>>20 Deep Fritz 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2604 >>> >>>Maybe we can call it "eriq's list" :) >yes you are right lets try -75 for 2600+ then ok maybe just -100 for all.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.