Author: Moritz Berger
Date: 09:11:00 10/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 1998 at 14:45:58, Dirk Frickenschmidt wrote: >While looking over some Fischer games again, I found an interesting position: > >Fischer,R (2760) - Petrosian,T (2640) [B42] >Buenos Aires cf Buenos Aires (7), 1971 >Now my question is: What is wrong about playing Bb5+ in this position, like most >or all programs probably would? Since my machines had nothing better to do overnight, I gave Rebel 10 and Junior 5 this position to chew (Rebel 10 regular analysis level, J5 both infinite analysis and 2-best-analysis). Moritz ¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤øø¤º°`°º¤¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸ Rebel 10 PII-450 120 MB hash: 00:04:43 13.00 1.16 Bd3-b5 a6xb5 Qa4xa8 0-0 Qa8-a5 b5-b4 Nc3-b5 00:12:43 14.00 1.19 Bd3-b5 a6xb5 Qa4xa8 0-0 Qa8-a5 b5-b4 Nc3-b5 00:54:32 15.00 1.16 Bd3-b5 a6xb5 Qa4xa8 0-0 Qa8-a5 b5-b4 Nc3-b5 05:00:09 16.00 1.20 Bd3-b5 a6xb5 Qa4xa8 0-0 Qa8-a5 b5-b4 Nc3-b5 (stopped after 10.5h, >1.000.000.000 nodes) Fischer,R - Petrosian,T r1b1k2r/3qbppp/p4n2/3p4/Q7/2NB4/PP3PPP/R1B2RK1 w kq - 0 1 Analysis by Junior 5.0 PII-450 128MB hash: 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 +- (2.01) depth: 3 00:00:00 0kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 b4 15.Nb5 Qg4 +- (1.70) depth: 6 00:00:00 3kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 b4 15.Nb5 Qg4 +- (1.70) depth: 6 00:00:00 5kN 13.Bb5 axb5 ± (1.40) depth: 9 00:00:00 38kN 13.Bb5 axb5 ± (1.40) depth: 9 00:00:01 65kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 b4 15.Na4 0-0 16.Nb6 Qb7 17.Qxb7 Bxb7 18.Rd1 ± (1.33) depth: 12 00:00:02 523kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 b4 15.Na4 0-0 16.Nb6 Qb7 17.Qxb7 Bxb7 18.Rd1 ± (1.33) depth: 12 00:00:03 968kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 b4 15.Na4 0-0 16.Nb6 Qe6 17.Be3 Bd7 18.Qa5 Re8 19.Nxd7 Nxd7 ± (1.27) depth: 15 00:00:16 5206kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 b4 15.Na4 0-0 16.Nb6 Qe6 17.Be3 Bd7 18.Qa5 Re8 19.Nxd7 Nxd7 ± (1.27) depth: 15 00:00:31 9488kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 0-0 15.Rd1 Bb7 16.Qa5 b4 17.Ne2 Ra8 18.Qb6 Ra6 19.Qd4 Qg4 20.f3 Qg6 ± (1.09) depth: 17 00:01:10 22775kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 0-0 15.Rd1 Bb7 16.Qa5 b4 17.Ne2 Ra8 18.Qb6 Ra6 19.Qd4 Qg4 20.f3 Qg6 ± (1.09) depth: 17 00:02:34 47828kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 0-0 15.Rd1 Bb7 16.Qa5 b4 17.Ne2 Ra8 18.Qb6 Ra6 19.Qd4 Qg4 20.Qxg4 Nxg4 21.Bd2 ± (1.06) depth: 18 00:03:37 68072kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 0-0 15.Rd1 Bb7 16.Qa5 b4 17.Ne2 Ra8 18.Qb6 Ra6 19.Qd4 Qg4 20.Qxg4 Nxg4 21.Bd2 ± (1.06) depth: 18 00:06:49 124582kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 b4 15.Na4 0-0 16.Nb6 Qf5 17.a4 bxa3 18.bxa3 Bc5 19.Na4 Bd7 20.Qa5 Bd6 21.Re1 ± (1.12) depth: 19 00:09:48 184240kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 b4 15.Na4 0-0 16.Nb6 Qf5 17.a4 bxa3 18.bxa3 Bc5 19.Na4 Bd7 20.Qa5 Bd6 21.Re1 ± (1.12) depth: 19 00:16:06 295472kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 0-0 15.Qa5 b4 16.Ne2 Re8 17.Be3 Bd6 18.Rad1 Qc7 19.Qxc7 Bxc7 ± (1.10) depth: 20 00:21:15 392691kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 0-0 15.Qa5 b4 16.Ne2 Re8 17.Be3 Bd6 18.Rad1 Qc7 19.Qxc7 Bxc7 ± (1.10) depth: 20 00:37:28 692193kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 0-0 15.Qa5 b4 16.Ne2 Re8 17.Re1 d4 18.Bd2 d3 19.Nf4 Qd4 20.Rad1 ± (1.06) depth: 21 00:47:00 870370kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 0-0 15.Qa5 b4 16.Ne2 Re8 17.Re1 d4 18.Bd2 d3 19.Nf4 Qd4 20.Rad1 ± (1.06) depth: 21 01:24:22 1584526kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 0-0 15.Qa5 b4 16.Ne2 d4 17.Bd2 Re8 18.Rae1 d3 19.Nf4 Qd4 20.Qa8 ± (1.12) depth: 22 01:46:08 1995698kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 0-0 15.Qa5 b4 16.Ne2 d4 17.Bd2 Re8 18.Rae1 d3 19.Nf4 Qd4 20.Qa8 ± (1.12) depth: 22 03:05:05 3530468kN 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 0-0 15.Qa5 b4 16.Ne2 Re8 17.Be3 Bd6 18.Rad1 Bc7 19.Qxb4 Ng4 20.Nf4 Nxe3 21.fxe3 ± (1.16) depth: 23 03:54:49 195257kN Analysis by Junior 5.0 (depth 20, 2-best-mode) PII-450 128MB hash: ± (1.10): 13.Bb5 axb5 14.Qxa8 0-0 15.Qa5 b4 16.Ne2 Re8 17.Be3 Bd6 18.Rad1 Qc7 19.Qxc7 Bxc7 ² (0.46): 13.Re1 Qxa4 14.Nxa4 Be6 15.Be3 a5 16.Bb5+ Kf8 17.Rac1 Rc8 18.Rxc8+ Bxc8 19.Bb6 Bb4 20.Nc3
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.