Author: Roger D Davis
Date: 12:31:24 07/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2003 at 16:36:25, ERIQ wrote: >What about adjusting ssdf ratings -100 for the 2700+ and 2800+ >and -50 for 2600+ and so on. > >This looks a lot closer to a possible fide rating for hardware involved. 2800+ >on a 1200 just looks unrealistic to me. > >1 Shredder 7.04 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2710 >2 Shredder 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2670 >3 Fritz 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2662 >4 Deep Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2661 >5 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2642 >6 Shredder 6.0 Pad UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 2624 >7 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2621 >8 Chess Tiger 15.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2620 >9 Shredder 7.0 UCI 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2617 >9 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2617 >11 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2615 >12 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2612 >13 Junior 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2647 >14 Hiarcs 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2632 >15 Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2625 >16 Ruffian 1.0.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2622 >17 Chess Tiger 15.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2618 >18 Shredder 5.32 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2609 >18 Gandalf 4.32h 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2609 >20 Deep Fritz 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2604 > >Maybe we can call it "eriq's list" :) How about just make the top program always equal to 2750. Everyone knows that we're not working with an absolute scale, and you can't compare humans and computers anyway... Roger
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.