Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:38:53 07/13/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2003 at 15:31:24, Roger D Davis wrote: >On July 12, 2003 at 16:36:25, ERIQ wrote: > >>What about adjusting ssdf ratings -100 for the 2700+ and 2800+ >>and -50 for 2600+ and so on. >> >>This looks a lot closer to a possible fide rating for hardware involved. 2800+ >>on a 1200 just looks unrealistic to me. >> >>1 Shredder 7.04 UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2710 >>2 Shredder 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2670 >>3 Fritz 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2662 >>4 Deep Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2661 >>5 Fritz 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2642 >>6 Shredder 6.0 Pad UCI 256MB Athlon 1200 2624 >>7 Shredder 6.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2621 >>8 Chess Tiger 15.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2620 >>9 Shredder 7.0 UCI 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2617 >>9 Chess Tiger 14.0 CB 256MB Athlon 1200 2617 >>11 Deep Fritz 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2615 >>12 Gambit Tiger 2.0 256MB Athlon 1200 2612 >>13 Junior 7.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2647 >>14 Hiarcs 8.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2632 >>15 Rebel Century 4.0 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2625 >>16 Ruffian 1.0.1 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2622 >>17 Chess Tiger 15.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2618 >>18 Shredder 5.32 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2609 >>18 Gandalf 4.32h 256MB Athlon 1200 MHz 2609 >>20 Deep Fritz 7.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2604 >> >>Maybe we can call it "eriq's list" :) > > >How about just make the top program always equal to 2750. Everyone knows that >we're not working with an absolute scale, and you can't compare humans and >computers anyway... > >Roger In this case it is better to make it 9750 so nobody will try to compare them. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.