Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is your engine too materialistic?

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 03:54:55 07/14/03

Go up one level in this thread


On July 12, 2003 at 20:02:24, John Merlino wrote:
>Sorry, clicked the button too soon....
>
>I'll tell you what Kittinger's engine thinks of these positions on Monday, as I
>don't have the program installed here at home.

very good.


>The answer to your two questions is:
>
>1) I don't know how the hash size is adjusted, and as far as I know it cannot be
>adjusted by the user.

Maybe there is an initioal file, as it was in Chessmaster ...
it would be a good idea to have influence on the hash size.
but maybe the program is taking it automatically.

>2) Tablebases are not supported, to the best of my knowledge....
>
>jm

i see.

maybe you can ask dave if this version is a later version and what he has
changed . I guess this would be pretty interesting for people here.

We all had no new kittinger engine for quite a long time and we would be pleased
to hear from Dave what he has done at the engine.

I bought W-chess, Power chess and also Wchess for ChessGenius.

So i would like to buy a new Kittinger engine too.

Thank you in forward.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.