Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 07:29:05 07/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2003 at 10:15:36, Ryan B. wrote: >How can you not call a program that beat GK amazing? I don't believe we really >have proof that programs today are better than Deep Blue. I would like to >believe that the newer programs are better but there simply is no proof. What >we do know is that Deep Blue beat an amazing chess player. I would call that >amazing... Just analyze the games. also watch the comments of kasparov. he just didn't care shit. he lost in 89 also from Genius. You find genius from 1989 very strong? GMs do not get paid to beat programs, for commercial interests of those that pay the matches. This despite what gets published. usually they get paid the total amount of money mentionned in advance even. This is real sad. If i get world champion perhaps a more objective match is possible. The only objective games we know of was Rebel versus GMs online. Rebel did very poor in those matches. The GMs got money only if they drew or won. So most quickly and politely safely drew quickly. A few victories against Rebel too. Those games were from Rebels side more impressive than the whole GK match against deep blue. Those games were a joke. I play blindfolded stronger than that. I'm Fidemaster in chess. my rating 2310. yes i can play a game without giving away material. So for me the computer isn't a holy thing as it is towards amateurs that always lose because of major blunders. Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.