Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:05:18 07/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2003 at 10:15:36, Ryan B. wrote: >How can you not call a program that beat GK amazing? I don't believe we really >have proof that programs today are better than Deep Blue. I would like to >believe that the newer programs are better but there simply is no proof. What >we do know is that Deep Blue beat an amazing chess player. I would call that >amazing... I think that 3-3 against kasparov when kasparov had the something similiar to the thing that he is playing is better than beating kasparov 3.5-2.5 when kasparov has no information about the machine so based on results deeper blue seems to be weaker than the programs of today. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.