Author: Peter Skinner
Date: 12:28:06 07/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2003 at 15:00:41, Chessfun wrote: >On July 14, 2003 at 11:18:24, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>I said no text :) > >Haven't updated my site in a while. But any search of my name here on current >messages would leave you able to click on my profile where you would my website >URL. > > Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws > 1 Tiger 15 normal style : 2660 34 27 327 58.3 % 2602 42.5 % > 2 Deep Fritz 7 : 2656 35 31 304 58.7 % 2595 35.2 % > 3 Fritz 8 : 2652 37 33 260 59.0 % 2588 36.5 % > 4 Shredder 7 : 2638 42 35 230 55.2 % 2602 33.0 % > 5 Junior 8 : 2636 53 42 140 57.1 % 2586 38.6 % > 6 Tiger 15 gambit agress: 2636 50 45 153 57.8 % 2581 32.0 % > 7 Shredder Paderborn : 2623 44 35 222 54.5 % 2592 34.2 % > 8 Fritz 7 : 2621 23 19 702 58.5 % 2561 39.7 % > 9 Shredder 7.04 : 2620 43 34 230 54.8 % 2586 34.8 % > 10 Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 2612 21 17 828 58.1 % 2556 42.0 % > 11 Chess Tiger 14.0 : 2610 22 16 792 56.0 % 2568 43.6 % > 12 Fritz 7 (No MMX) : 2609 49 36 162 58.0 % 2553 44.4 % > 13 Deep Fritz : 2599 27 21 555 54.7 % 2566 37.3 % > 14 Ruffian 1.0.1 : 2593 48 35 200 51.7 % 2581 34.5 % > 15 Junior 7 : 2591 30 24 498 51.5 % 2581 28.3 % > 16 Chessmaster 9000 : 2589 40 62 126 49.6 % 2592 42.1 % > 17 List 504 : 2583 29 49 200 49.2 % 2589 48.5 % > 18 Hiarcs 8 : 2582 31 43 238 46.6 % 2606 39.5 % > 19 Gambit Tiger 1.0 : 2569 36 29 321 55.0 % 2534 33.3 % > 20 Fritz 6 : 2553 19 14 1226 53.3 % 2530 37.1 % My real interest in your rating list is that I would like to know the strength difference between Gandalf 4.32h and Gandalf 5.1 if there is any. The SSDF shows that Gandalf 4.32h is still slightly stronger. What are your findings? Do you know of another list that uses Gandalf extensively? Peter.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.