Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 13:09:57 07/14/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2003 at 12:57:07, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote:
>The following diagram is from the game Polugayevsky vs E Torre London 1984
>[D]rn1qr1k1/1p2bppp/p3p3/3pP3/P2P1B2/2RB1Q1P/1P3PP1/R5K1 w
>Here white played 19.Bxh7+.This is found by Chessmaster 8000 after 2 hours and
>38 minutes at 1800MHZ.Here is the info:
>Time Score Positions Depth Moves
>2:38:37 0.39 1828329861 13 Bxh7+ Kxh7 Qh5+ Kg8 Rg3 Bf8 Bg5 Qc8 Rc1
> Nc6 Bf6 Nxd4 Rxc8 R(a)xc8 Qd1 Rc4 Bg5
>Now the amazing thing is that Chessmaster 9000 never gets 19.Bxh7+ even at
>16 plys and beyond.Here is how the actual game ended:19.Bxh7+ Kxh7 20.Qh5+ Kg8
>21.Rg3 g6 22.Rxg6 fxg6 23.Qxg6+ Kh8 24.Qh6+ Kg8 25.Qxe6+ Kh8 26.Qh6+ Kg8 27.Qg6+
>Kh8 28.Qh5+ Kg8 29.Bh6 Bf8 30.Qg6+ Kh8 31.Bxf8 Rxf8 32.Qh6+ Kg8 33.Ra3
>{Black Resigns}
>Perhaps CM9000 represents only a very minor improvement over CM8000.
CM9000 is clearly much stronger from CM8000 in playing strength. Even if
you had 30 positions where CM8000 would solve it, while CM9000 not, that
would not mean CM8000 is better.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.