Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:21:33 07/15/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2003 at 18:59:33, Dave Gomboc wrote: >On July 14, 2003 at 10:13:58, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>So brutus is dangerous because it is going to score a big number of points in >>its home competition. Shredder is simply very good. And the junior team is >>always mercilous getting somehow points, but i don't fear them. You can't win >>world titles continuesly by just being mercilous and having a well debugged >>engine. > >But Junior has won world titles before... :-) > >>The only unsure thing always in world champs is the role of the openingsbooks. >>In that sense Shredder is the program to beat there. > >It sounded from your description that you had problems with configuration issues >last year, and also some testing oversights. I guess the question is if you >have solved that this year, and if so, how much difference it will make. Most >competitors are not standing still either! > >Dave > >P.S. So do you have a prediction for what place you will finish in? :-) A supercomputer system time is too expensive to go for the second spot.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.