Author: Alexander Yates
Date: 01:36:06 07/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 17, 2003 at 03:40:18, Uri Blass wrote: >On July 17, 2003 at 03:12:00, Alexander Yates wrote: > >>On July 17, 2003 at 00:26:18, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >> >>>On July 16, 2003 at 23:34:47, Alexander Yates wrote: >>> >>>>On July 16, 2003 at 22:49:04, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 16, 2003 at 22:19:18, Sally Weltrop wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On his "last stand for humanity" >>>>>> >>>>>>If this is such a hearfelt longing to redeem the human race. Why doesn't he put >>>>>>his heart & $$ where his mouth is. >>>>>> >>>>>>NO appearance fee and say a 12 game match with these stipulations: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>a win = $100,000 >>>>>>a draw = $30,000 >>>>>>a loss = $25,000 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>He'd actually stand to win more than last match. The games would be much more >>>>>>intense AND it would generate much more publicity & excitement than the "puppet >>>>>>matchs" we've been having lately. >>>>>> >>>>>>"last stand for humanity" >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>HA! >>>>>> >>>>>>It's been 6 years Garry and you still haven't done it. Time to stop the excuses >>>>>>and accept what people really want to see and not for your benefit. >>>>>The Money does not matter here ;as Garry or anybody else is just not strong >>>>>enough to do the job.The late matches were not puppet matches ;The reason Fritz >>>>>and Junior looked bad in the games they lost is because these 2 programs are >>>>>not particularly good against humans.But they do well against other programs. >>>>>Indeed this is a point that is not understood by many people here .That is a >>>>>program like Fritz may be better than say program Y by 100 elo points in >>>>>the SSDF list but program Y may be beeter than Fritz by 100 elo points or more >>>>>when matched against humans.Garry should in my opinion play against >>>>>CHESSMASTER.Then he stands no chance of winning. >>>> >>>>Absolute Nonsense! >>>> >>>>What does a patzer know? >>>> >>>>I can beat CM...so Garry would crush it, if he chose to do so....programmes are >>>>stupid and can be lead into areas the can't understand....that's a fact! >>>> >>>>GM Yates >>>Gm Yates ;Are you kidding me? beating CM ? show the proof or shut the heck up. >> >>No, why should I joke about something so obvious, even a duffer like yourself >>should understand? Proof....well there is plenty of proof, I need not post games >>here, to justify my point. >> >>BTW why do you believe CM is the best programme, it clearly isn't. >> >>Junior, Tiger, Fritz and Shredder are stronger. They are beaten too, so what? > >We have not enough data to know if chessmaster is the best. >The programs are at similiar strength with single processor when I assume that >shredder is slightly better based on results(I do not know enough about Junior). > >You may claim that chessmaster is probably weaker than Junior,Fritz and Shredder >because chessmaster does not support more than one processor but I see no >evidence that it is weaker than Tiger. > >Uri Mr. Blass This may all be true, however, my point was to young Ali, he's badly misinformed if he really believes the top programmes or CM are better than top GM's and Kasparov, not which programme is best. I agree that CM is very competitive, on a single processor, but it isn't the point I'm trying to convey to Ali. My point is, programmes haven't taken over the Grandmaster world, at least not yet, and CM as strong as it is, certainly isn't in the same league as Kasparov, or many other top GM's, niether are the so-called professional programmes, which many feel are stronger. CM appears best at tactics or at least goes for more tactics, and it is very good if not the best at mate finding. But to categorically claim CM is best and better than Kasparov, is simply stupid. It's either a troll or gross ignorance. Alex
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.