Author: Gerd Isenberg
Date: 06:17:51 07/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
>>Uri, if "i" is a constant, there is no waste of time! >>A1[j] or A[1][j] produce the same assembler output. > >This in fact depends on the compiler implementation. The good old TurboC had to >generate a few additional code lines in case of double indexed arrays. >Regarding, the 32 Bit compiler by MS you are of course right, Gerd; there is no >performance penalty in this case. > >May be, this is a pedantic remark of mine. -:) > >Uli > Hi Uli, he,he, the good old TurboC. Was TurboC not able to calc some constant address expressions? What about constant int expressions like i = (5*(1<<4));-) Regards, Gerd
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.