Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 14:21:43 07/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2003 at 16:53:29, Gerd Isenberg wrote:
>dblat: 220 - vdlat: 208 !?
Perhaps, a consequence of some issues you mentioned. But still rather
comparable.
>Sequential access times are much higher than your's, hmm.
Only for small offsets. From 16 on (16 means 16 * sizeof(void *), so actually
64) your numbers are much better.
>C:\Source\dblat\Release>dblat 300000000
^^^^^^^
Du gehörst also auch zu den Warmduschern, die alles aus der GUI heraus machen!
:-)
Cheers,
Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.