Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Another memory latency test - result

Author: Dieter Buerssner

Date: 14:21:43 07/18/03

Go up one level in this thread

On July 18, 2003 at 16:53:29, Gerd Isenberg wrote:

>dblat: 220 -  vdlat: 208  !?

Perhaps, a consequence of some issues you mentioned. But still rather

>Sequential access times are much higher than your's, hmm.

Only for small offsets. From 16 on (16 means 16 * sizeof(void *), so actually
64) your numbers are much better.

>C:\Source\dblat\Release>dblat 300000000
Du gehörst also auch zu den Warmduschern, die alles aus der GUI heraus machen!


This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.