Author: Brian Kostick
Date: 17:49:01 07/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2003 at 19:50:01, George Tsavdaris wrote: >I don't know if this position is good for white and i don't know if >by these 4 games, you would like to prove that Junior's evaluation >was optimistic, but i know that a 5 minute game doesn't prove absolutely >anything about one position, and even 100, 5' games doesn't prove anything. >The only way to see who is better in a position is to let an engine analyse it >for 1-2 days(or less) or play 20-25 games with long time controls (>1.5 >min/move) between some top engines. It is reasonable to that top engines will not blunder given the position and the time (5 min to continue the game). What Junior 8 evaluated at +2 to +3 did not stand up to cross examination. If you desire to get statistical proof feel free to do so, however, also understand most engines won't look at certain branches until they move in from the horizon. The opinion of a strong human player is always welcome imo. The primary thing I wished to show was the the positon IS NOT as good for white and Junior 8 thought. I provided supporting evidence, not proof. BK
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.